As of August 2026, record retention for Canadian dietitians runs from five years in Quebec to sixteen in British Columbia, and six jurisdictions publish no period reaching a private practice. The clock starts from a different event depending on the province: the last visit, last service, last encounter, last entry or last episode of care. NutraPlanner soft-deletes client health data rather than erasing it on a misclick, and lets you export every client's complete chart yourself.
How long do dietitians have to keep client records?
Five years in Quebec, ten in Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba (and in Nova Scotia, as advice rather than a requirement), and sixteen in British Columbia. The event each period runs from determines the actual disposal date.
The instruments differ in force too. Quebec's five years is the only period that is a flat legislated floor; Saskatchewan's regulation offers ten years as one of two options a practice's written retention policy may adopt. British Columbia's and Ontario's both sit in college standards that practitioners are legally obliged to meet. In British Columbia, the Health Professions and Occupations Act requires licensees to practise in accordance with all practice standards. In Ontario, failing to maintain a standard of practice is professional misconduct under O. Reg. 680/93. Alberta's appears only in a handbook, phrased "should".
See Quebec’s five-year period, and why it has no paediatric rule.
Two practitioners applying "10 years" to the same client can land years apart. Consider a client last seen in 2026 who had been in intermittent care since 2020. In Ontario the clock runs from the last visit. In Manitoba it runs from the last entry in the record, which may be later than the last visit if notes were added afterwards. In Saskatchewan it runs from the last episode of care, which may group visits differently again.
| Province | Period | Clock starts | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|
| British Columbia | 16 years | Last encounter | Practice Standard; the HPOA requires compliance with practice standards |
| Ontario | 10 years | Last visit | College standard; breaching it is misconduct under O. Reg. 680/93. PHIPA sets no numeric period |
| Saskatchewan | 10 years | Last episode of care | Regulation — but only where the policy adopts the 10-year option rather than a purpose-based schedule |
| Manitoba | 10 years | Last entry | College practice direction |
| Alberta | 10 years | Last service | Practice Handbook, phrased "should" — guidance |
| Nova Scotia | 10 years — advisory | Not specified | Regulator guidance, phrased "consider" |
| Quebec | 5 years — the shortest in Canada | Last service rendered | Regulation C-26, r. 105 — binding. No separate rule for minors |
| NB, PE, NL, NT | None published | — | Verified against the statute and its regulations — each defers to a policy or sets no period |
| Nunavut | None reaching private practice | — | No dietetic regulator; ATIPPA binds the territorial government only |
| Yukon | None in the statute | — | HIPMA defers to "prescribed requirements, if any"; the regulation under it is unchecked |
How long do you keep records for a client who was a minor?
Longer, and the trigger is usually the age of majority rather than the last visit. Ontario runs to the client's 28th birthday, ten years from the 18th. British Columbia runs 16 years from the age of majority, and because British Columbia's age of majority is 19, a paediatric record can run close to the client's 35th birthday.
Alberta uses whichever is longer of two years past the age of majority or ten years. Saskatchewan's regulation requires ten years after the last episode of care or until age 20, whichever period is longer. The Saskatchewan College of Dietitians' own documentation guidance goes further and suggests ten years past the age of majority, an age-29 floor, so treat the regulation's age 20 as a minimum. Quebec has no paediatric rule at all: the absence is in the regulation, not an omission from this page.
A paediatric caseload therefore cannot be managed on the adult schedule.
Is the retention rule law or college guidance?
British Columbia's 16 years sits in a Practice Standard, and the Health Professions and Occupations Act requires licensees to practise in accordance with all practice standards, so the number lives in a college document while compliance with it is statutory. Ontario reaches the same place by a different route: the 10 years is a College of Dietitians of Ontario standard, and failing to maintain a standard of practice is listed as professional misconduct in O. Reg. 680/93. PHIPA itself sets no numeric period, though it does impose retention duties. Saskatchewan's 10 years is in a regulation, but the regulation permits a purpose-based retention schedule instead.
Alberta's figure is guidance. It appears only in the College's Professional Practice Handbook, phrased as "should". The bylaws contain no retention provision, the Standards of Practice state no period, and neither the Health Information Act nor its regulations set one for client clinical records. The ten-year periods they do contain attach to records of disclosure and to records of consent, not to client files.
Six jurisdictions publish no period reaching a private practice. For four of them the answer comes from reading the statute and its regulations directly: New Brunswick and the Northwest Territories defer to a written policy or to regulations that set no number. Prince Edward Island's only ten-year figures attach to disclosure and access logs rather than to the clinical record. Newfoundland and Labrador's Personal Health Information Act requires secure retention and disposal without naming a period, and its sole year figure is a 120-year application cut-off.
In Nunavut no published retention period reaches a private practice, because all three routes that would carry one are closed. There is no dietetic regulator to set a standard: Dietitians of Canada lists ten, and all are provincial. The Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act binds only the territorial government, as its own Information and Privacy Commissioner states. And the Public Health Act governs public-health surveillance records rather than a practitioner's clinical file.
Yukon publishes no period in its statute either. The Health Information Privacy and Management Act requires a custodian to have a policy retaining personal health information in accordance with the prescribed requirements, if any, and names no number anywhere. Its only year figures concern the age of majority, deceased persons, disclosure look-backs and a prosecution limit. Whether the general regulation made under it prescribes a period has not been checked, so confirm with the territorial regulator before relying on the absence.
Do financial records follow the same rule as clinical records?
No. They are a separate obligation, and in some provinces a separate period. The College of Dietitians of Ontario treats financial records as a distinct standard from the clinical record, retained at least 10 years, and enumerates billing failures as professional misconduct including failing to itemize an account on request.
Alberta's College sets no retention period for financial records and points to the Canada Revenue Agency instead. British Columbia takes a third approach: its current Practice Standard requires the date, the type of service, the amount charged and the method and date of payment to be recorded in the patient record itself, which then falls under the same sixteen-year rule. Manitoba is the simplest: one ten-year clock from the date of the last entry covers client and financial records together.
Where a college is silent, the applicable floor is the Income Tax Act's six years from the end of the last taxation year to which the records relate. That is shorter than every clinical period on this page except Quebec's five years, so a practice that disposes of financial records on the tax schedule while keeping clinical records longer is applying both rules correctly.
Frequently asked questions
How long must a dietitian keep client records in Ontario?
Ten years from the client's last visit. For a client who was a minor, the records are kept until their 28th birthday, ten years from the 18th. The period is a College of Dietitians of Ontario standard rather than a figure in the statute (PHIPA sets no numeric retention period), but failing to maintain a standard of practice is professional misconduct under O. Reg. 680/93, so it is not optional either. Ontario also treats financial records as a distinct standard from the clinical record, with its own 10-year clock.
Which province requires dietitians to keep records the longest?
British Columbia, at 16 years from the date of the last encounter. It is set in a CHCPBC Practice Standard, and the Health Professions and Occupations Act requires licensees to practise in accordance with all practice standards, so observing it is not optional. For a client who was a minor the period runs 16 years from the age of majority, which at 19 in British Columbia puts a paediatric record close to the client's 35th birthday.
Is Alberta's 10-year retention period a legal requirement?
No. The figure appears only in the College of Dietitians of Alberta's Professional Practice Handbook and is phrased as "should". The College bylaws contain no retention provision, the Standards of Practice state no period, and neither the Health Information Act nor its regulations set one for client clinical records. The ten-year periods those do contain attach to records of disclosure and of consent. Apart from Nova Scotia, whose 10-year figure is also advisory, every other province that publishes a number puts it in an instrument a practitioner is obliged to observe.
What if my province does not publish a retention period?
Six jurisdictions publish none that reaches a private practice: New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Yukon. The first four were confirmed against the statute and its regulations. Nunavut is different in kind: it has no dietetic regulator at all, and its access-to-information statute binds only the territorial government. Yukon's statute, the Health Information Privacy and Management Act, defers to prescribed requirements, if any, and names no number, though the regulation under it has not been checked. Practitioners in the named jurisdictions are generally directed to retain records "per applicable legislation", which is not itself a period. For financial records specifically the Income Tax Act sets a floor of six years from the end of the last taxation year the records relate to. For clinical records, take advice from your college's practice advisory service rather than adopting another province's number.
References
- CHCPBC — Ethics and Practice Standards (British Columbia), effective 2026-04-01
- Health Information Protection Regulations, 2023 (Saskatchewan)
- College of Dietitians of Manitoba — Practice Direction 16.6, Record Keeping
- College of Dietitians of Alberta — record keeping (ch. 10)
- Regulation respecting the keeping of records by dietitians — C-26, r. 105 (Quebec)
- Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 (Ontario)
- CDO — Professional Practice Standards for Record Keeping (Ontario)
- O. Reg. 680/93 — professional misconduct (Ontario)
- NSCDN — documentation guidelines (Nova Scotia)
- Personal Health Information Act (Newfoundland and Labrador), SNL2008 c. P-7.01
- Income Tax Act s. 230 — records retention
Similar articles
Start a Dietitian Practice in Canada: Rules by Province
Registration, titles, record retention, privacy law and incorporation — what differs by province, with key primary sources linked.
Read article →Practice managementCanadaDo Dietitians Charge GST/HST in Canada? The Three-Part Test
The Excise Tax Act puts maintaining health and preventing disease inside the exemption. The three conditions that actually decide it.
Read article →